New Barn SchoolHuckleberry Therapeutic School
Inspection, results, pupils and attendance side by side.
Summary of the comparison
This page compares New Barn School and Huckleberry Therapeutic School.
Neither school has a composite score. Our score needs published attainment data, which is not available for every school or every nation.
New Barn School was judged Inadequate and Huckleberry Therapeutic School was judged Good.
Side-by-side comparison
| Measure | New Barn School | Huckleberry Therapeutic School |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Our score | Not scored | Not scored |
| Local ranking | Not ranked | Not ranked |
| Inspection | Ofsted: Inadequate | Ofsted: GoodStronger figure |
| School type | Other independent special school | Other independent special school |
| Age range | 6-19 | 5-11 |
| Gender | Mixed | Mixed |
| Pupils on roll | 71 | 20 |
| Capacity | 130 | 35 |
| Location | RG20 8HZ | OX12 8NE |
| GCSE results | ||
| Cohort | 5 | Not reported |
| Pupils | ||
| Pupils in the census | 92 | 14 |
| Free school meals (ever 6) | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| SEN support | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| SEN with an EHC plan | 100.0% | 100.0% |
marks the stronger figure on measures with a clear direction. Rows describing a school's intake, such as free school meals, English as an additional language and SEN, carry no marker: they describe who a school serves, not how well it serves them.
Historical trends
Each solid line is one school; the dashed line is the national average.
Pupils on roll
Full profiles: New Barn School · Huckleberry Therapeutic School