Blue Mountain EducationProgression 2 Work
Inspection, results, pupils and attendance side by side in Cossall.
Summary of the comparison
This page compares Blue Mountain Education and Progression 2 Work.
Neither school has a composite score. Our score needs published attainment data, which is not available for every school or every nation.
Blue Mountain Education was judged Good and Progression 2 Work was judged Requires improvement.
Side-by-side comparison
| Measure | CossallBlue Mountain Education | Progression 2 Work |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Our score | Not scored | Not scored |
| Local ranking | Not ranked | Not ranked |
| Inspection | Ofsted: GoodStronger figure | Ofsted: Requires improvement |
| School type | Other independent special school | Other independent special school |
| Age range | 8-18 | 11-16 |
| Gender | Mixed | Mixed |
| Pupils on roll | 9 | 10 |
| Capacity | 15 | 60 |
| Location | Cossall, NG16 2SD | NG16 2EZ |
| GCSE results | ||
| Cohort | 4 | 4 |
| Pupils | ||
| Pupils in the census | 15 | 8 |
| Free school meals (ever 6) | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| SEN support | 33.3% | 62.5% |
| SEN with an EHC plan | 66.7% | 37.5% |
marks the stronger figure on measures with a clear direction. Rows describing a school's intake, such as free school meals, English as an additional language and SEN, carry no marker: they describe who a school serves, not how well it serves them.
Historical trends
Each solid line is one school; the dashed line is the national average.
Pupils on roll
Full profiles: Blue Mountain Education · Progression 2 Work